Latest News

Civil Society-Military Relations

National Defense University

Lisa Schirch presented at The 7th International Lessons Learned Conference with Danish Ambassador Franz-Michael Skjold Mellbin and James Kunder of USAID.  Panelist addressed the need for improving communication and coordination mechanisms between governments, civilian and military personnel and between civil society and state actors.  The conference was attended by over 500 military and government leaders from around the world. 


Click here for the full event agenda.

The principal objectives of this conference were to develop guidelines for the design of stability operations and conflict prevention initiatives in the following areas:
  • Political transitions. How the international community can support a smooth political transition, political settlement, reconciliation with former regime supporters, and social and political stability; how it can expedite and strengthen transition to host nation control; and how it can encourage greater citizen participation while maintaining social stability.
  • Local security forces. How the international community can shape military assistance and security cooperation to enhance security without infringing on individual freedoms; how it can improve the reform and reintegration of existing local security forces and enhance the advise, train, and equip function; and how it can improve local police functions especially when only military forces are present to guide the development of the police force.
  • Cultural intelligence. How the international community can better understand operationally relevant socio-cultural aspects of local societies and how it can bridge the gap between improving intelligence related to the local population and the typically more robust intelligence related to kinetic operations. This may include topics such as local governance structures, informal and formal justice systems, tribal relations, and the relationship between the central government and the periphery.
  • Economic engagement. How the international community can use the economic element to foster political settlement; how it can improve job prospects of local populations; how it can improve its understanding of the relationship between donor assistance, local absorptive capacity, and corruption; and how it can help governments build a long-term revenue base that does not depend exclusively on donor, military and development aid.

Afghan Peace Process in Comparative Perspective

November 29, 2011

Designing a Comprehensive Peace Process for Afghanistan
3P presented research at the US Institute of Peace (USIP) and at private briefings at the Pentagon and State Department.  The panel discussion event at USIP focused on a recent USIP PeaceWorks report, “Designing a Comprehensive Peace Process for Afghanistan.”  Presenters included Lisa Schirch from 3P, Nilofar Sakhi who also contributed to the same paper.  Other panelists included Hamish Nixon, Project Coordinator USIP, Peace Research Institute Oslo and Caroline Hartzell, USIP Jennings Randolph Fellow.
 
Research on this topic was undertaken by 3P during five trips to Kabul, Afghanistan, and one trip to Pakistan between 2009 and 2011. This report, sponsored by the Center for Conflict Management at the U.S. Institute of Peace, draws on comparative research literature on peace processes to identify lessons applicable to Afghanistan and makes recommendations to the international community, the Afghan government, and Afghan civil society for ensuring a more comprehensive, successful, and sustainable peace process.

Forum on US Leadership After UNESCO

November 17, 2011

After UNESCO: Implications for U.S. Leadership
3P's Israeli-Palestinian Congressional Forum organized a November 17 briefing for 40 Congressional staff from both Republican and Democrat offices.  The forum discussed the October 31 UNESCO vote to grant the Palestinian PLO full membership.

This historic vote has led to a legislatively mandated cut-off of U.S. funding to UNESCO.  Possible future non-payments of U.S. financial contributions to other UN entities that admit Palestine as a member include agencies that represent important U.S. national interests.  Agencies such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and the World Health Organization (WHO) have called into question the strategy of linking U.S. policy toward the PLO and its funding of the UN. 

Click here to read the report After UNESCO: Implications for U.S. Leadership
(From left to right): Nizar Farsakh, General Director, PLO General Delegation to the U.S.; Roee Ruttenberg, Independent Tel Aviv-based Israeli-American journalist; Amb. Mark P. Lagon, Former U.S. Amb. at Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons, Dept. of State, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs; Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen, Moderator, Center for Conflict Management; Amb. Nancy Soderberg, Former Deputy Asst. Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs; Jeffrey Kushan, Former Alternate Representative to the UN, Intellectual Property/Patents expert, Sidley Austin LLP.







What Is Human Security

October 20 - 22, 2011

3P asked global civil society colleagues from around the world,
 "What is the meaning of human security?" 

These peacebuilders gathered in New York City in November 2011 to articulate a global civil society position toward prevailing counter-terrorism measures (CTMs) employed by governments and inter-governmental organizations. Read a seminal report on CTMs titled, Friend Not Foe: Opening Spaces for Civil Society Engagement to Prevent Violent Extremism produced by the Fourth Freedom Forum and the Kroc Institute of International Peace Studies at Notre Dame University. 

Global civil society organizations who participated in the summit include the following, along with many others:
Nahdatul Ulama - Indonesia
Rights Now Collective for Democracy
3P Human Security